Pardon Me? Changes to pardon system will have unintended consequences

Pardon Me? Changes to pardon system will have unintended consequences

Canadian Lawyer, May 17, 2010

By: Edward Prutschi

In the face of recent pardons both real (sex-offending hockey coach Graham James) and presumed (notorious serial killer Karla Homolka), it should come as little surprise to anyone that Public Safety Minister Vic Toews is anxious to revamp a system that has come under increasingly blinding public scrutiny.

A quick glance at the numbers implies that Canada’s current pardon system is little more than an administrative rubber stamp. In 2009-10, over 24,000 pardons were granted by the National Parole Board. This represents success for 98 per cent of those who filled out the application.

While these statistics reveal a pardon system ripe for revision, the legislation currently being proposed appears designed to target the exception while inadvertently penalizing the rule. A fair discussion of pardon reform requires a clear understanding of the purpose of pardons in the first place coupled with full knowledge of what a pardon does, and does not, do.

Despite some political hyperbole to the contrary, a pardon has never been an indication of “government forgiveness.” By replacing the term “pardon” with “record suspension” the proposed legislation is continuing to oversell the actual value of obtaining a pardon.

A pardoned offender who has been placed on the national sex offender registry or DNA databank continues to be subject to searches that access these lists. The fear that a pardoned James could dupe a vulnerable sector screening and return to coaching young boys’ hockey is entirely unfounded.

Moreover, the perception that pardoned offences under the current system are “forgiven” or “erased” dramatically overstates the value of a pardon. Foreign jurisdictions — most notably the United States — are under no obligation to respect a Canadian pardon and frequently have access to an offender’s complete criminal record, including pardoned offences.

Even within Canada, the current legislation does not delete a pardoned offence but simply moves the crime from one box in the digital criminal record to another. Contrary to popular belief, there are circumstances in which pardoned offences can be disclosed and viewed and the pardon itself can even be entirely revoked.

While it may seem glaringly obvious, often forgotten in the current emotional debate over pardons is the fact that consideration of a pardon does not occur until after an offender has served the entirety of his or her sentence. The fundamental underpinning of any pardon system is that once an offender has served out his sentence, his debt to society is paid and his punishment should end.

Reasonable people can argue — as they often do — that Canadian sentences are woefully inadequate to properly “pay” that debt but that is a different discussion that must be divorced from a logical analysis of the pardon system. The role of a pardon is to alleviate unintended ancillary consequences that come with a criminal conviction but that were never meant to be part of an offender’s sentence.

Think of the drug user who can never travel outside of Canada; the impaired driver who can no longer be accepted to her professional school program; or the permanent resident convicted of an assault in a bar fight who may now be ineligible for Canadian citizenship. It is these examples of collateral damage that were never intended to be part of the offender’s sentence which a pardon is designed to address.

Much of the recent hysteria over the inadequacy of Canada’s pardon system is rooted in the perception that violent recidivist criminals are having their past misdeeds wiped clean allowing them to lie in hiding in our communities until they inevitably reoffend.

Statistics explode this popular myth. Since 1970, over 400,000 pardons have been granted. Pardoned offences are never truly erased from our system and can be revoked should the recipient ever be convicted of a new offence. And yet, of those 400,000 pardons in existence, over 96 per cent remain in force indicating that pardoned individuals are extremely unlikely to engage in new criminal activity.

Much of the success of the current pardon system in maintaining such a low revocation rate can be traced directly to the waiting periods enforced before someone is eligible to apply for a pardon. As the law currently stands, summary convictions can be pardoned three years after the completion of sentence while the more serious indictable offences must wait five years.

The key phrase that seems to have been lost in the current rush to prove one’s get-tough-on-crime bona fides is “after the completion of sentence.” The three- and five-year waiting periods are, in practice, substantially longer as an individual only becomes eligible after completing all aspects of his or her criminal sentence including jail time, payment of fines, and completion of probation and parole.

Thus, the first-time offender convicted of drinking and driving who receives the minimum sentence of a fine with a one-year driving prohibition cannot apply for a pardon until four years after his conviction (the three-year clock only begins to run after the one-year driving prohibition has been served). With probation on serious offences running as long as three years after an offender is released from jail, violent offenders will wait far more than five years before they become eligible for a pardon.

James entered guilty pleas to his sexual assault charges in 1997 and only received his pardon a full decade later in 2007.

The new law’s proposal to expand the waiting period for pardons to five and 10 years for summary conviction and indictable offences respectively will do little to keep Canadians safer from the likes of James or Homolka. But what it may do is prevent a 19-year-old convicted of street racing from ever getting into medical school.

Before making a decision on what kind of pardon system we want, Canadians need to answer a fundamental precursor question: do we care more about political pandering that yields little benefit to genuine public safety or do we want to see a system that encourages rehabilitation and reintegration for those who have succeeded in abandoning their criminal antecedents?

If you need representation after being charged with a criminal offence, call a Toronto Criminal Lawyer from Bytensky Prutschi Shikhman located in Toronto, Ontario. Our criminal lawyers are available 24/7 to talk to you.

Our Testimonials

Gurkirat Rai
Gurkirat Rai
22:25 20 Nov 22
Spoke with Mr. Boris on the phone, with respect to a appeal And I got to say he’s a very honest professional individual, very unique in nature. He will tell you straight up if you have grounds of appeal or merits. If you will win or lose. Great personality to work with, someone who cares about Justice over money.Thank you
Sabrina Conliffe
Sabrina Conliffe
19:43 09 Nov 22
Brittany Smith is a very professional and hard-working lawyer. She dealt with my case quickly and effectively. Also, she explained everything along the way. Everyone should have this type of lawyer in their corner. Thank you very much!
Danielle West
Danielle West
19:32 09 Nov 22
A family member of mine used Ms. Shikhman as their lawyer. From the beginning of the process, she was absolutely fierce in looking after his interests. She secured the most reasonable bail conditions that we were told by other lawyers would be impossible to get. After a complicated long trial we got a “NOT GUILTY” from the jury! We could not be more grateful for all of her hard work.
TA
TA
18:12 21 Oct 22
Brittany Smith is more than an excellent Criminal Lawyer! She put all her effort on my case, days and nights. I can’t thank you enough Brittany. You nailed it..
Nesf123
Nesf123
20:54 04 Oct 22
Sonya is an excellent lawyer who provided the best outcome for my case. I consulted with many lawyers before deciding to work with Sonya. She is honest, professional and delivers on her word.
Dod Ndreu
Dod Ndreu
23:22 02 May 20
Edward is an excellent lawyer. He is very professional and hard working criminal lawyer. I hired him for my sons criminal matter as he was looking at numerous charges and some serious jail time. He worked very hard on my sons case and dropped all charges. My son was able to get away with no jail time, thanks to Edwards hard work.. Edward was a godsend to me and my family in the hardest time of my life, and I will never forget. Every thing he told me during the court sessions happened exactly as he had planned them. I would very highly recommend Edward, his work speaks for itself. If you want positive results this is the guy to hire.Thank you Edward for what you have done for me and my family.All the best,Dod
Christopher Seiler
Christopher Seiler
17:20 04 Apr 20
Sonya Shikhman was a total life saver. She took my case in her hands and never left me doubting that I had the best representation I ever could. Thank you for your professionalism, your commitment and accuracy.
Adriano Carpenter
Adriano Carpenter
02:05 04 Apr 20
Sonya is very professional, knowledgable and pleasant lawyer. She was always there when we needed her. She was patient, explained every step of the very unpleasant process and prepared us for every day of the trial. I have been recommending Sonya and her law firm ever since. Thank you, Sonya! Keep up Great Work!
Alex Chalmiev
Alex Chalmiev
11:28 12 Sep 19
The service that their law firm provides is top notch. I had the pleasure to work with Sonya Shikhman she is an incredible lawyer. Very sharp, straight to the point, and gets the job done. It’s very rear that you see the professionalism on that level.
tara
tara
06:41 07 Feb 19
This is by far the best legal representation in Toronto. Sonya Shikhman is tough and brilliant. I highly recommend this firm.
Richard D
Richard D
00:17 24 Apr 18
An excellent lawyer. Edward Prutschi is thorough, non-judgmental and effective. He returns calls quickly and handles everything with a personal touch that puts you immediately at ease. I would highly recommend him
Andreea Felinar
Andreea Felinar
17:01 20 Aug 15
Edward Prutschi is very professional and very helpful. Very patiently, Mr. Prutschi offered me so many detailed responses to my questions. If you need the best criminal lawyer, Mr. Prutschi is the best of the best! Thank you for your efforts, Mr. Prutschi!Cristina F.
Maria konyukhova
Maria konyukhova
15:03 07 Mar 14
Sonya Shikhman is my go-to resource for criminal referrals. She is brilliant in her knowledge and application of criminal legal principles and has a superior understanding of client needs and the most practical avenues to meeting them.
Steven Klein
Steven Klein
15:51 03 Sep 13
I recently referred a client to Ed for assistance. The feedback from the client was excellent. Thanks Ed!
Shannon Stein
Shannon Stein
14:16 11 Jun 13
Ed Prutschi has always been a highly ethical, hard working professional criminal lawyer who gets results for his clients at all times. Our agency, Just For Today Harm Reduction Services, has worked with Ed for nearly ten years and all of our clients feel, as we do, that they have been well served by an empathetic lawyer who places his clients first and foremost.
David Levy
David Levy
21:20 23 May 13
Ed Prutschi is an excellent criminal lawyer. His command of the law and his experience in the Courtroom make him a stellar advocate in any criminal matter. I refer clients to Ed without hesitation because I know they will receive the zealous advocacy they want.
Sharon Shore
Sharon Shore
18:16 15 Mar 13
Ed is an excellent criminal lawyer. He is very professional, extremely responsive and gets good results for my clients. I never hesitate in referring clients to him. Ed has an intimate understanding of how different areas of law intersect with and affect the criminal proceedings. Ed is also a great resource for other lawyers. He is constantly reporting on new case law, and is very knowledgable about cutting edge areas of law.
Lance Lehman
Lance Lehman
18:03 12 Feb 13
Ed’s knowledge of criminal law is first-rate. His analysis is quick and thorough. His integrity is second to none. I never think twice about whom to call when one of my clients has a criminal law issue and I have never been disappointed with the results.
Stuart Rudner
Stuart Rudner
00:03 12 Feb 13
I have known Ed Prutschi since we were in law school together. When I am asked for a great criminal lawyer, I think of Ed because he is well-known for his advocacy and effectiveness in representing his clients’ interests. Ed demonstrates his vast knowledge through his writing and social media efforts, and his record of success demonstrates that he understands what his clients need and the strategies necessary to achieve it. In addition to knowledge and strategy, Ed brings with him a personality that makes people comfortable at very difficult times in their lives. I have referred people to Ed in the past and have never had any complaints, which is important to me. When I refer someone to another lawyer, I never want to hear that the lawyer was unresponsive or did a poor job. Ed always makes me look good.
Next Reviews

Call Now ButtonCall Now to Discuss Your Case.